Loading…
17
I used to think digital mockups were fine until I saw a real printed proof
I designed a set of business cards for a client and sent them a PDF mockup. They approved it, so I sent the files to the printer. When the physical proof arrived, the colors looked totally wrong, way darker than on my screen. The printer told me my monitor wasn't calibrated and the PDF didn't show the paper texture. I had to redo the whole job and eat the cost, about $150. Now I always pay for a physical proof before a full print run. Has anyone else been burned by skipping a hard copy proof?
3 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In3 Comments
janab875mo ago
robert_bennett29 is right about paper texture... but the lighting where you check the proof matters just as much. Office fluorescents make colors look way different than daylight or a print shop's bright lamps. It's another reason that physical check is so key before you sign off.
5
robert_bennett295mo ago
Man, that is a ROUGH lesson to learn the hard way. Happened to me with some brochures once, and it's a sick feeling seeing the colors come out wrong. That paper texture thing is no joke, it changes how ink sits on the page. Now I just see a physical proof as a non-negotiable cost of doing business, like insurance. It stings to pay for it, but way less than a whole messed-up print run.
-1
gavinwood5mo ago
Our shop had a client reject 5,000 menus over a 10% cyan shift on uncoated stock. The screen proof looked perfect. It's not just texture, it's how the paper drinks the ink. A physical proof under the right light is the only real check. That job taught me to build the proof cost into the first quote, no questions asked.
0